W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > December 2008

Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2008 December 3

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:36:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020D9C926C@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>


Attendees
---------
 Glenn xx:26
 Norm xx:20
 Paul 
 Richard
 Henry
 Daniel  

[6 organizations (6 with proxies) present out of 9]

Regrets
------- 

Absent organizations
--------------------
ASIT
Google
François Yergeau


> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>    the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>    or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).

Accepted.
 
> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
> 
> 
> 3.  XML 1.0
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
> 
> The XML 1.0 5th Edition Recommendation is at
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/
> 
> 
> 4.  XML Test Suite.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
> 
> ACTION to Richard:  Construct a test case for the XML test suite 
> issues raised by Frans Englich:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ 
> 
> 
> 5.  Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
> 
> Richard has partially updated the NS PE doc at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html
> 
> Richard added some discussion at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#npe29
> The WG agreed with his direction and asked that he go forward with it.
> 
> ACTION to Richard:  Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29.
> 
> The NS 1.0 2nd Ed Errata document at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/xml-names-errata
> now includes NE17 which addresses what would otherwise have
> been definitions of NCName and friends that were out of sync
> with XML 1.0 5th Ed.
> 
> ACTION to Richard:  Update the PE document to indicate that
> NPE31 and NPE32 have now been published as errata NE17 and
> NE18 respectively.

Done

> 
> 6.  LEIRIs
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
> 
> A summary of what specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs is at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045
> 

And the list is:

XML 1.0 6th Edition
XML 1.1 3rd Edition 
XML Base 2nd Edition
XLink 1.1 (First Edition)
XInclude 3rd Edition 

> Martin's has made a new latest version of IRI-bis available at 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-04
> 
> The progression of XML Base, XLink, and XInclude
> (and XML 1.0 6th Ed) all must await this note.
> 
> The WG Note defining LEIRIs is published at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-leiri-20081103/
> 
> 
> 7.  XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
> 
> The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/
> and announced at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112
> 
> The XML Base PER review period ended 30 June 2008.
> 
> Richard developed a DoC document for XML Base at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xmlbase-2e/disposition.html
> 
> The lastest draft of the spec is at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/xmlbase-2e/
> 
> ACTION to Richard:  Update the spec to reference the LEIRI note
> (and give it a date).

Richard has added the LEIRI reference.  He will make
a boilerplate pass.

> 
> ACTION to Henry:  Take XML Base 2nd Ed to Rec.
> 
> 
> 8.  XLink 1.1.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
> 
> The earlier XLink CR was published at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ 
> 
> The XLink 1.1 LC was published at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/
> 
> The LC review period ended 16 May 2008.
> 
> Norm has prepared a DoC at 
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/
> 
> ACTION to Henry:  Continue to get the XSD for
> XLink at an accessible URI.
> 
> There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD 
> should default the xlink:type attribute value. 
> None of this effects our last call because the
> XSD/DTD are not normative.
> 
> John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for
> each of our conformance levels.
> 
> ACTION to Henry, John:  Think about having a basic level
> conformance XSD for XLink.
> 
> Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR.
> 
> ACTION to Henry:  Review the history and make a recommendation
> as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR.
> 
> 
> 9.  XInclude 3rd Edition
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
> 
> XInclude 2nd Edition is at:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115
> 
> See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for
> LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition.
> 
> ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed
> with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs.
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
> [3] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Nov/0026
> 
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2008 16:37:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 December 2008 16:37:53 GMT