W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > August 2008

RE: Last call announcement: CURIEs

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:31:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020C502864@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

The minutes of 2008-06-4 at [1] (a meeting I missed) say:

<excerpt>
Norm plans to review it. John did a review.

As long as you don't claim they're namespaces, we don't 
care what you do in XML content.

Henry wonders about where they came down on alternate 
namespace binding mechanisms for CURIE prefixes in XML 
languages.

Section 3 reveals "Such host languages MAY also provide 
additional prefix mapping definition mechanisms."

Henry expresses concern that a user who sees an alternate 
mechanism and then tries to use that mechanism for element 
and attribute names will be confused.

John doesn't think it's a problem.

Henry: they still aren't clear on whether or not barenames 
are CURIES.  The schema data type doesn't allow it, but 
the BNF does.

Norm: Do we want to make a WG comment?

No, apparently not.
</excerpt>

Apparently, we can't not make a WG comment.

Norm, did you ever review CURIEs?

Norm, Henry, did the TAG send in a review?

We need to figure out what we want to send in for a review.

paul

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Jun/0001

> 
> From: Roland Merrick [mailto:roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, 2008 July 31 11:09
> To:  ht@w3.org; Grosso, Paul
> Cc: steven.pemberton@cwi.nl; ht@w3.org
> Subject: Fw: Last call announcement: CURIEs
> 
> 
> 
> Greetings, it appears that we failed to complete the 
> requirements of the process for the recent Last  of CURIE 
> Syntax 1.0 by failing to obtain agreement to review the 
> document and provide feedback by some of the groups we 
> identified as those we would value review by. 
> 
> That said, we are particularly interested in a review by XML 
> Core Working Group. It is of course impossible to review by 
> the original deadline and we are now approaching a quiet time 
> over the summer so we would appreciate it if you would review 
> the document and provide feedback by 5 September. 
> 
> Please confirm that you are prepared to help us with this request. 
> 
> Regards, Roland
> FBCS, CITP
> IBM Software Group, Strategy, Software Standards
> Tel/Fax: +44 (0)1926-465440
> Mobile: +44 (0)77 2520-0620 
> ----- Forwarded by Roland Merrick/UK/IBM on 31/07/2008 12:52 ----- 
> 
> From: 	"Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> 
> To: 	Chairs <chairs@w3.org> 
> Cc: 	"XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, "www-html@w3.org" 
> <www-html@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org> 
> Date: 	08/05/2008 17:47 
> Subject: 	Last call announcement: CURIEs	
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This is a last call announcement for:
> 
>                 CURIE Syntax 1.0
>                 A syntax for expressing Compact URIs
>                 http://www.w3.org/TR/curie 
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/curie> 
> 
> Comments should be sent to www-html-editor@w3.org
> 
> The review ending date is 10 June 2008.
> 
> The group resolved to make this transition at
>                 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/03/19-xhtml-minutes#item07 
> <http://www.w3.org/2008/03/19-xhtml-minutes#item07> 
> 
> Patent disclosure page:
>                 
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/32107/status 
> <http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/32107/status> 
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Roland Merrick, Steven Pemberton
> Co-chairs, XHTML2 WG
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales 
> with number 741598. 
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, 
> Hampshire PO6 3AU 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 15:32:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 August 2008 15:32:42 GMT