W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: XML 1.0 and XML 1.1

From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:11:25 -0700
To: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
Cc: Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com>, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF3389D41D.CF4EFE3C-ON88257385.002753F9-88257385.00279D40@ca.ibm.com>
I don't see how that answers my concern about XML.
Some (many) don't.  Like Java.  Like XML Spy.
This conversation started from saying Gee if you're going to *require* an 
update to XML 1.0, then this is something else that could be *required* as 
well.
"Some do" is a *may* not a *must*.
Just out of curiosity, can you stick an xinclude in the middle of an 
attribute value?

John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com 

Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer





Liam Quin <liam@w3.org> 
10/30/2007 07:05 PM

To
Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com>
cc
John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, 
public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Subject
Re: XML 1.0 and XML 1.1






On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:51:10PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:45:30AM -0700, John Boyer wrote:
>> Just speaking for myself, xinclude doesn't seem to do the job because 
xslt
>> engines  don't  resolve xincludes, but they do resolve external entity
>> references.
> 
>   Depend which ones... there is nothing preventing XInclude and XSLT 
being
> glued together.

Right.

And some do, of course :-)

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 07:12:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:36 GMT