- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:11:20 +0000 (GMT)
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> We noted that the current XML spec only makes the existence
> of a # sign (fragment identifier) an error. It makes nothing
> else an error. We were just trying to make clear that the
> same set of error conditions continued to be true. In particular,
> there is no need for an XML processor to check the syntax of
> a system literal beyond the "no fragment identifier" restriction
> since no such restriction currently exists in the XML 1.{0|1)
> Recommendation.
>
> Do you disagree with that assessment?
No, I just wanted to be clear about the reasoning.
-- Richard
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 09:11:44 UTC