> We noted that the current XML spec only makes the existence > of a # sign (fragment identifier) an error. It makes nothing > else an error. We were just trying to make clear that the > same set of error conditions continued to be true. In particular, > there is no need for an XML processor to check the syntax of > a system literal beyond the "no fragment identifier" restriction > since no such restriction currently exists in the XML 1.{0|1) > Recommendation. > > Do you disagree with that assessment? No, I just wanted to be clear about the reasoning. -- RichardReceived on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 09:11:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:37 GMT