W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2007

XML resource identifiers - time to rethink?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:15:49 +0000
To: public-xml-core-wg <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bsldg65p6.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A further problem has been pointed out ([1] and following thread) -- I
can't make our next call, but Philippe le Hegaret is checking with Ian
Jacobs to see what our options are if we decided we wanted to rapidly
publish a definition of XRIs separately, and then put normative
references to that definition in xml:base 2e and XLink 1.1, without
resetting their Process state if at all possible.

So, agenda item, please.

ht

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2007JanMar/0001.html
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFyz6lkjnJixAXWBoRAv1UAJ9ImAo5BJ8XhXRblFzSXRd4AFUJ+QCfVIc+
MvAz5DyuKZ1N9fnLPDKhA+c=
=QSqb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:16:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:37 UTC