- From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:05:37 -0500
- To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Cc: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 05:10:11PM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > I see no reason, given that we at least de-emphasizing XML 1.1, to give > it this kind of extensibility until there is a proven need. It seems to me that it's a good way to allow for the (slight) possibility of an XML 1.2 in the future, without doing any harm in the mean-time. It also improves the fiction about any XML processor being able to handle any XML document. I wouldn't want to lose the proposed changes to name characters because of lack of consensus over versioning, though. Best, Liam -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Friday, 28 December 2007 04:05:44 UTC