W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > December 2007

RE: XML Core WG ACTION items

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:41:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30209CAFC9B@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 2007 December 19 8:15
> To: Grosso, Paul; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: XML Core WG ACTION items
> 
> > ACTION to Richard and Norm (and any others):  Review
> > 
>
http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/08/proposed-xml10-4e-and-xml11-2e-errata.html
#PE161
> 
> Can someone remind me what is intended by the parenthetical phrase
> "(and other XML strings meant to be used as URI references)".  Are we
> suggesting that all XML applications that use URIs should accept
> the-things-that-will-be-LEIRIs?

Good question.  I hope we'll be able to discuss that in 
a half hour on today's telcon.

I wonder what an "XML string" is?

Is there anything in the XML grammar other than SystemLiteral
that is a URI reference sort of thing?

Whereas any attribute value (or, for that matter, element
PCDATA content) could represent a URI reference, I'm assuming
we aren't saying anything about such values here, are we?

The stylesheet PI's href pseudo attribute could potentially
be a LEIRI, but that isn't part of the XML spec.

paul
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:41:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:38 UTC