W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > December 2007

RE: XML 1.0 5th Ed and related PEs [was: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2007 December 5]

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:28:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30209C31219@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Thursday, 2007 December 13 9:27
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: XML 1.0 5th Ed and related PEs [was: Minutes for XML 
> Core WG telcon of 2007 December 5]
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org On Behalf Of 
> François Yergeau
> > Sent: Wednesday, 2007 December 12 20:11

> > >> 8. XML 1.0 5th Edition

> > Draft 5th Edition is at 
> > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/12/PER-xml-20071212-review.html

> > - I took a first stab at the Status sections, taking inspiration
> > from the previous PERs and RECs. 

Upon reflection, I'd like to augment the status a bit more.

To the paragraph that talks about incorporating the changes 
dictated by the accumulated errata, I'd like to add another
sentence something like:

 In particular, erratum [Exx] relaxes the restrictions on element
 and attribute names thereby providing in XML 1.0 the major
 end user benefit currently achievable only by using XML 1.1.

where [Exx] is the erratum that [PE160] ends up becoming.

paul

[PE160] 
http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/08/proposed-xml10-4e-and-xml11-2e-errata.html#PE160
Received on Monday, 17 December 2007 17:30:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:38 UTC