W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > December 2007

RE: Proposed resolution of HRRI/IRI discussion (expected schedule)

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:15:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30209A7CFFF@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, "Martin Duerst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <public-iri@w3.org>

Martin,

Since several important XML related specs will be
depending on the updated IRI RFC, could you give us
your best idea of schedules.

thanks,

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Monday, 2007 November 26 9:52
> To: Martin Duerst
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; 
> public-iri@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Proposed resolution of HRRI/IRI discussion 
> (expected schedule)
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Martin Duerst
> > Sent: Monday, 2007 November 19 20:50
> > To: Henry S. Thompson
> > Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; 
> > public-iri@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Proposed resolution of HRRI/IRI discussion
> 
> Martin,
> 
> With only a few relatively minor wording issues remaining,
> it looks like the XML Core WG will be able to reference the
> definition of LEIRIs from your upcoming revision of the
> IRI RFC from the various XML related Recommendations that
> need to do so (XML 1.0, XML 1.1, XML Base, XLink 1.1, and
> XInclude).
> 
> We are particularly interested in being able to reference
> the definition of LEIRIs from XML Base and XLink 1.1 since
> those have been sitting at PER and PR respectively for years.
> 
> We are planning to reissue drafts of those specs referencing
> LEIRIs as soon as you can make available another ID.  We will 
> then need to investigate how much further we can progress 
> our specs until the revised IRI spec is really an RFC.
> 
> Can you please give us your best guess as to when we can
> expected the next ID and when the revised IRI spec
> might become an RFC so that we can plan our schedule.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> paul
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 17:15:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:38 UTC