- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:27:16 -0400
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87slahpvjv.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> was heard to say:
|> Now what is the next step? Is there some minimum time before
|> we can request it be published as an RFC? If we publish a
|> new (non-RFC) draft, then does that restart whatever clock
|> there is before we can request it go to RFC?
|
| It can be processed as an independent submission by sending email
| to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. No specific delay is imposed, but
| the IETF will review it.
I suggest we let two weeks tick by, make the edits Paul suggested and
address any other comments, then produce a draft...-01.
If, two weeks later, there are no new comments, I suggest we ask the
IETF to publish it as an RFC.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A wonder is often expressed that the
http://nwalsh.com/ | greatest criminals look like other men.
| The reason is that *they are like other
| men in many respects.*-- Hazlitt
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 18:27:28 UTC