W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > May 2006

xinclude 2nd Ed review [was: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 April 26]

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:13:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D302032AFBD4@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Wednesday, 2006 April 26 10:45
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 April 26

> > Daniel has drafted XInclude 2nd Edition with all 
> > the errata (including the IRI one) applied.  Details:
> > 
> > Daniel created a new subdirectory in CVS space, and worked
> > from the initial XInclude XML version. Result is 
> > http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/04/XInclude/REC-xinclude-20060423.html
> > with a diff version at
> > 
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/04/XInclude/REC-xinclude-20060423-r
eview.html
> > 
> >   Notes on preparation of the Second Edition:
> >     - Worked from http://www.w3.org/2004/12/xinclude-errata/
> >     - Updated the DTD to reference 2.10 and changed default
> >       embedded stylesheet
> >     - Added (Second Edition) to header
> >     - Fixed Previous versions to point of first edition, removed
> >       old previous
> >     - added author
> >     - added XHTML diff altloc
> >   Left TODO:
> >     - check that the IPR link is still valid
> >     - update the XInclude errata link to a new location, check
> >       the Status in general
> >     - make sure the section in 4.1.1 is really what was intended
> >       by PEX17
> 
> John Cowan sent some minor comments at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Apr/0022
> and DV has already reflected that suggestion in the draft.
> 
> ACTION to Paul:  Review and send comments.
> 
> ACTION to Francois:  Review section 4.1.1 and see if it
> references the XML spec as we intended.

It looks fine to me, though I didn't double check the
errata document with the latest draft.  Also, I defer
to Francois on whether the paragraph in 4.1.1 needs
any tweaking.

paul
Received on Monday, 1 May 2006 15:16:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:33 GMT