While I am very much in favor of allowing IRIs in xml:base attributes, I believe that it would be improper to expose them as IRIs in the Infoset's [baseURI] property. This would in effect be a redefinition of the term "base URI", and there is no reason for it, since any IRI can be readily transformed into a URI. Since the Infoset is abstract, this does not of course prevent any concrete API or protocol from exposing a base URI in IRI form when possible. Also, where are XML Resource Identifiers explained, and do they allow any or all of "<", ">", '"', space, "{", "}", "|", "\", "^", and "`" (which cannot appear in IRIs)? -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org www.ccil.org/~cowan www.ap.org If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on the shoulders of giants. --Isaac NewtonReceived on Friday, 3 March 2006 13:56:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:33 GMT