RE: XML PE 157

And we had consensus on this, so:

ACTION to Francois:  Update the proposed resolution of PE 157 in
the PE document [1] accordingly.

However, I'm unclear on exactly how this is a response to Dieter's
comment at [2].  We need for someone to volunteer to send a response
to him.  

John, can you volunteer to do that?

paul

[1]
http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/08/proposed-xml10-4e-and-xml11-2e-errata.html
#PE157
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2006JulSep/0007

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Cowan
> Sent: Wednesday, 2006 December 20 11:08
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: XML PE 157
> 
> 
> The proposal is to make the following two changes to XML 1.0 (and the
> same for XML 1.1):
> 
> Change the second sentence of the first paragraph of 4.3.3 from
> 
> 	The terms "UTF-8" and "UTF-16" in this specification do not
> 	apply to character encodings with any other labels, even if the
> 	encodings or labels are very similar to UTF-8 or UTF-16.
> 
> to
> 
> 	The terms "UTF-8" and "UTF-16" in this specification do not
> 	apply to related character encodings, including but not limited
> 	to UTF-16BE, UTF-16LE, or CESU-8.
> 
> Also change the last sentence of the first paragraph of 
> Appendix F from
> 
> 	We consider the first case first.
> 
> to
> 
> 	We will consider these cases in turn.
> 
> -- 
> There is / One art                      John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
> No more / No less                       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> To do / All things
> With art- / Lessness                     -- Piet Hein
>

Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 17:29:58 UTC