W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > December 2006

RE: Transition Request: PER Request for XML Base Second Edition

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:47:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D302059C1A4D@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Cc: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>, "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Monday, 2006 December 11 11:36
> To: Grosso, Paul; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Transition Request: PER Request for XML Base 
> Second Edition
> > > No, it doesn't work to put diffspec documents through xmlspec.
> > > You have to put them through diffspec with the parameter
> > > show.diff.markup set to 0.  (Right Norm?)
> > Well, whatever, I think it's a bit more appropriate for the
> > XML to display as the final--rather than the review--version,
> > though I don't feel strongly about it for the PR review.
> So do I, but I don't know how to do it.  What does Francois do
> for the XML spec?

It looks like he's got:

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="REC-xml.xsl"?>

and for XML 1.0 4th Ed I get final version, but for
XML 1.1 2nd Ed, I get the diff markup version, so
I'm guessing the REC-xml.xsl stylesheet has a different
parameter setting in the two cases.

I'll have to defer to Francois and Norm about this.
It isn't crucial for the PR in any case.

Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 17:47:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:37 UTC