Re: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 August 23

Konrad Lanz wrote:
> Thomas Roessler wrote:
>>> ACTION to Thomas and Konrad (and maybe Richard): Figure out whether 
>>> to reference 2396 or 3986 or whatever.     
> So the upcoming work for the editors of c14n 1.1 would be to include
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jun/0032.html
> amended by
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jul/0019.html
> and explaining the appendix as in
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jul/0022.html
The updates mentioned above would be done in parallel with the updates 
to xml:base
and if xml:base will reference RFC 3987 then c14n 1.1 shall also 
reference this one.
>> Richard, Konrad, and I went through this.  The conclusion was that
>> consistency between c14n and xml:base is paramount, and more
>> critical than consistency between c14n and xml signature in terms of
>> what spec is referenced.
>>
>> The proposal is, hence, to leave the normative text and references
>> of c14n 1.1 as is for a first public working draft, but to add a
>> note in the "status of this document" section that says that the
>> section on xml:base is expected to evolve along with the group's
>> work on that recommendation.
>>
>> A second WD of c14n could then be published in parallel with the
>> FPWD for xml:base 1.1.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   
>
>


-- 
Konrad Lanz, IAIK/SIC - Graz University of Technology
Inffeldgasse 16a, 8010 Graz, Austria
Tel: +43 316 873 5547
Fax: +43 316 873 5520
https://www.iaik.tugraz.at/aboutus/people/lanz
http://jce.iaik.tugraz.at

Certificate chain (including the EuroPKI root certificate):
https://europki.iaik.at/ca/europki-at/cert_download.htm