W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > August 2006

RE: Namespace specs

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:05:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30204495896@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Friday, 2006 August 11 08:59
> To: Grosso, Paul; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Namespace specs
> 
> > The Rec-ready versions should not have the following para 
> in the status:
> [...]
> > Nor should they have the para:
> [...]
> > I'm not sure if this should just be deleted, or if there
> > is a replacement para for Recommendations.
> 
> I've inserted the paragraph required by pubrules.
> 
> The pubrules checker 'did not find a link labeled "errata" in the
> first paragraph after the authors'.  This is strange, because there
> is one.
> 
> We put a sentence in the abstract for PER:
> 
>   Particular attention is drawn to the incorporation of erratum NE13
>   which was published very recently (1 June 2006).
> 
> I'm not sure whether we planned to leave that in the REC version.
> 

I guess I'd delete that from the Rec, though I could go either way.

paul
Received on Friday, 11 August 2006 14:05:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:34 GMT