RE: REC-ready XML specs

François,

fwiw, you are listed as editor of the 3rd Ed, but not (also)
the 4th Ed in XML 1.0.

In the other three Recs, we don't get specific about on
what versions various people worked.  I don't feel strongly
how we handle this myself.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> François Yergeau
> Sent: Thursday, 2006 August 10 12:02
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: REC-ready XML specs
> 
> 
> The hopefully REC-ready XML 1.0 and 1.1 specs are now visible at 
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/08/xml10-4e/Overview.html and 
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/08/xml11-2e/Overview.html.
> 
> The changes from the PER are:
> 
> -- Status section updated for REC status, including the 
> patent language 
> provided by Philippe
> 
> -- RFCs 2396 and 2732 repalced by RFC 3986.  This involves 
> updating the 
> bibliography entries (two deleted, one added) and references in two 
> places in 4.2,2.  I have also uploaded errata [1] [2] for this.
> 
> There are also new empty errata documents for the new specs [3] [4].
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata
> [3] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-4e-errata
> [4] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-2e-errata
> 
> -- 
> François
> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 18:37:55 UTC