- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:08:19 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:daniel@veillard.com]
> Done, I recorded all potential errata where the resolution led
> to an update to the spec, i.e.:
> PEX1, PEX6, PEX7, PEX10, PEX11, PEX15, PEX16
>
> I uploaded the resulting errata document:
> http://www.w3.org/2004/12/xinclude-errata
Here's my review.
In general, looks good, except I'm not able to
correspond PEX10 in the errata document to PEX10
in the PE document. I think you copied PEX7 to
PEX10 and then didn't update the text.
Editorial
---------
PEX6, Rationale, s/specidied, t/specified. T/
(Note both a typo and a punctuation change.)
PEX11, Rationale, s/superceeded/superceded/
PEX15:
Suggested new text for improved wording, change:
Since the xpointer attribute is not a URI reference,
and that %-escaping is not done in XPointers, so '%'
is an ordinary character in the value of the xpointer
attribute.
to:
Since the xpointer attribute is not a URI reference,
and %-escaping is not done in XPointers, '%'
is an ordinary character in the value of the xpointer
attribute.
Rationale, s/ressource/resource/
REX16, Rationale,
change:
specification, all XInclude processors
to:
specification. All XInclude processors
paul
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 18:08:21 UTC