On Monday, May 9, 2005, 2:49:37 PM, Ian wrote: IH> On Mon, 9 May 2005, Chris Lilley wrote: >> >> BH> Could you propose text that should be added? >> >> If an implementation supports CSS 2.1 and also supports xml:id, then the >> xml:id attribute must be treated as an ID for the purposes of CSS >> selector processing. IH> This would be very bad because it would leave other ID-based APIs IH> (such as getElementById) ignorant of xml:id. Um, as you would say, getElementById is out of scope of CSS. The wording above does not affect xml:id processing in any way. It merely adds a conditional conformance clause on CSS implementations to actually do something with the reported value. IH> Fix the problem at the source, not at the symptom. I'm not seeing a problem. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity LeadReceived on Monday, 9 May 2005 13:01:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:32 GMT