W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > March 2005

Re: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 March 9

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:47:58 -0500
To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050309204758.GA1552@skunk.reutershealth.com>

Belated apologies.

Paul Grosso scripsit:

> In the infoset, we do expose the base URI as a property, and 
> if we were to switch xml:base and XML itself from 2396 to 
> 3986, the value of the base URI property would be different.
> Richard isn't sure we want to do that.

I think that we should not to do that.

> Should we change [base URI] to [base IRI]?  There are
> issues to decide here.  We will hold off on doing anything
> here for now.

Still less should we do this.  At most, we might want to add a separate
[base IRI] property, but I see no point; it contains very little information
not in the base URI.

-- 
John Cowan  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com
Arise, you prisoners of Windows / Arise, you slaves of Redmond, Wash,
The day and hour soon are coming / When all the IT folks say "Gosh!"
It isn't from a clever lawsuit / That Windowsland will finally fall,
But thousands writing open source code / Like mice who nibble through a wall.
        --The Linux-nationale by Greg Baker
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:48:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:32 GMT