W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2005

Re: XML 1.1 backwards compatibility

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:34:02 -0800
To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF1D4E05DA.D0DA03BA-ON86256FA6.0055841A@us.ibm.com>

Paul is right. And I never ever liked it and I still don't.
Arnaud  Le Hors - IBM, On Demand Operating Environment Standards

Saturday, February 12, 2005 7:04 AM
To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com>
Subject: Re: XML 1.1 backwards compatibility

On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:50:51AM -0500, Paul Grosso wrote:
> My memory is that the big reason we took out the C1 control
> characters from 1.1 was that folks like Rick Jelliffe wanted
> them to be an error so that we'd be able to catch more
> encoding errors.
> [I was always dubious of that argument/decision, but maybe
> I'm remembering things wrong/incompletely too.]

  that's my recollection too,


Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@veillard.com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ |
Received on Saturday, 12 February 2005 15:34:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:32 GMT