W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2005

FW: id Last Call comment from i18n

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:07:51 -0500
Message-ID: <F13E1BF26B19BA40AF3C0DE7D4DA0C0302F1A491@ati-mail01.arbortext.local>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

I don't expect to suggest any changes to the CR version,
but I thought I'd pass this on to see if the WG members
have any thoughts.

paul

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xml-id-request@w3.org  On Behalf Of Richard Ishida
Sent: Wednesday, 02 February, 2005 2:06
To: public-xml-id@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; 'Architecture Domain'
Subject: xml:id Last Call comment from i18n

. . .

We note that the definition of the value of an xml:id attribute is
defined only in terms of a valid NCName as defined by XML 1.0.  The
definition for NCName in XML 1.1 is different.  

We think this consitutes a major defect in the spec in its own right,
but it also has significant internationalization implications for users
of XML 1.1. 

Please specify that the valid value is different in the case of XML 1.0
and XML 1.1.

For the I18N WG,

============
Richard Ishida
W3C
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2005 15:08:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:32 GMT