- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:51:09 -0700
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
WSDL defines a set of new XPointer fragments [1] for identifying components in the abstract model of a WSDL document. The primary purpose of this new fragment syntax is to enable a URI to be constructed identifying a component, specifically to allow one to make RDF assertions about that component. But it is also possible to use the fragment during dereferencing. We'd like the XML Core WG's input on an XPointer question. For use with the application/wsdl+xml media type (which we are defining), we would like to use unqualified xpointer scheme names, such as: #interface(foo) However, it is conceivable someone might want to deliver the WSDL document as application/xml. #interface(foo)element(id-foo) Is an unqualified scheme name acceptable in this case? Or would it be necessary to qualify the scheme? #xmlns(wsdl,http://wsdl...)wsdl:interface(foo)element(id-foo) If the above is preferred for the application/xml media type, is there any problem with having a different form for the application/wsdl+xml media type? #interface(foo)element(id-foo) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#wsdl-uri-references
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 14:51:12 UTC