W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > September 2004

Re: Moving towards "strict" xml:id checking

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:10:05 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b8yblc8z6.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> writes:

> The proposal I was trying to make when we ran out of time is the following:
>
>   It is an error for an ID value to be specified more than once.
>   A processor which detects this error MUST report it. Processors
>   SHOULD attempt to detect all such errors.
>
> That's in "intent-ese" rather than "spec-ese". And we also perhaps
> need a note somewhere explaining that processors which do not read all
> of the available declarations will not be able to detect every
> possible error of this sort.

I strongly support this level of SHOULD/MUST etc.  Anything less
renders the whole exercise nearly pointless, in my view.

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:10:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:31 GMT