W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > December 2004

Re: FW: XInclude use case for Device Independence

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:26:46 -0500
To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Cc: Rotan Hanrahan <Rotan.Hanrahan@MobileAware.com>
Message-id: <87hdmfzkft.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Rotan Hanrahan <Rotan.Hanrahan@MobileAware.com> was heard to say:
| Thank you Norman. I am copying to DIWG. Your mention of XSLT is in keeping
| with a recent update to this issue in which "Attribute Value Templates" is
| proposed for consideration. I'm sure we shall return to this complex issue
| after the holidays.

Yes, I had been made aware of that and didn't notice that it wasn't
mentioned in the message I replied to.

I think using AVTs fits in with one of the suggestions I made:

| -----Original Message-----
| From: Norman Walsh [mailto:Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM]
| Sent: 21 December 2004 16:01
| To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
| Cc: Rotan Hanrahan
| Alternatively, you could invent an expression language and say that
| your processing model is: load the document with XInclude suppressed,
| evaluate the expressions, and then apply an XInclude processor.

Instead of inventing an expression language, you could say that you
expand AVTs. You still have to fiddle with the processing model, of
course, because you don't want the processor to attempt to expand
XInclude before you evaluate the AVT!

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:27:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:34 UTC