W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-binary@w3.org > November 2004

RE: question: Increasing factor for XML vs Binary

From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Date: 05 Nov 2004 17:46:10 -0500
To: mc@xegesis.org, Silvia.De.Castro.Garcia@esa.int, public-xml-binary@w3.org
Message-ID: <E1CQCqi-0002BD-9f@frink.w3.org>



Sigh most of that was lost somewhere ... I'm on a handheld ...

I'll interperet this as 'how much of a compression factor can be achieved by using a binary vs XML encoding of the same data.'  The usual answer, I'm afraid: it depends.  As best I recall from a literature survey:

larger docs compress better than small,

you can get more compression if you use more CPU (and hence battery) power,

you can get very good compression if you assume that the schema is known to both sides and docs are valid instances,.

My recollection is that 5:1 compression is realistic for arbitrary XML and 10:1 and higher is feasible with shared schemas.


-----Original Message-----
From:  Silvia.De.Castro.Garcia@esa.int
Date:  11/4/04 8:56 am
To:  public-xml-binary@w3.org
Subj:  question: Increasing factor for XML vs Binary 

Hi all,
        I would like to know the estimation order of the increasing factor 
for the XML format respect to the equivalent binary product, I mean, which 
is the order of the overload that will supose using XML instead of binary 
format?

Thank you very much,
Best regards,

Silvia de Castro.
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 22:46:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 1 December 2005 00:07:42 GMT