W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-binary@w3.org > November 2004

RE: question: Increasing factor for XML vs Binary

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:21:11 -0600
Message-ID: <71C38086EA230D43941DD0A3BAFF8CA9059148@bocnte2k3.hou150.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Mike Champion" <mc@xegesis.org>, Silvia.De.Castro.Garcia@esa.int, public-xml-binary@w3.org

My personal experience with practical data was 39:1.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xml-binary-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-xml-binary-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mike Champion
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 4:19 PM
To: Silvia.De.Castro.Garcia@esa.int; public-xml-binary@w3.org
Subject: RE: question: Increasing factor for XML vs Binary



I'll interperet this as 'how much of a compression factor can be
achieved by using a binary vs XML encoding of the same data.'  The usual
answer, I'm afraid: it depFrom my literature survey,

-----Original Message-----
From:  Silvia.De.Castro.Garcia@esa.int
Date:  11/4/04 8:56 am
To:  public-xml-binary@w3.org
Subj:  question: Increasing factor for XML vs Binary 

Hi all,
        I would like to know the estimation order of the increasing
factor 
for the XML format respect to the equivalent binary product, I mean,
which 
is the order of the overload that will supose using XML instead of
binary 
format?

Thank you very much,
Best regards,

Silvia de Castro.
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 22:21:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 1 December 2005 00:07:42 GMT