Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

On Mar 1, 2009, at 8:36 AM, Ben Adida wrote:

> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> The transformation *result* is RDF data. It doesn't tell you how to
>> interpret parts of the source.
>
> No, sorry, I believe that's *exactly* what it tells you. When you're
> writing HTML with GRDDL (or with eRDF, which has the same indirection
> property), you're saying "this is how to interpret my value of @rel."

Microformat-defined rel and class values have their usual semantics  
regardless of whether one links a GRDDL transform converting them to  
RDF.

Regards,
Maciej