- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@amazon.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:59:20 -0800
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@thomsonreuters.com>
- CC: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
> > They do by inclusion, in that the datatype for @lang is the XHTML > M12N > datatype LanguageCode, which is based upon the XML Schema datatype > language, which is inturn based upon BCP 47. > It's true if you mean Schema 1.1 Part 2, located here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#language But XHTML M12N (shudder, another numeronym) references RFC 3066 directly (and not BCP 47) and XML Schema 1.0. These are only references to BCP 47 insofar as RFC 3066 used to be BCP 47. Addison Addison Phillips Chair -- W3C Internationalization WG Editor -- IETF LTRU WG (BCP 47) Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture.
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 19:00:11 UTC