- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:00:50 -0600
- To: Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
- CC: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Thanks for your detailed comments. My responses are embedded below. Masataka Yakura wrote: > Hi guys. > > Well, I know it's really late to comment on it, sorry. But there are > some issues in the current ED of xhtml-media-types > >> 1. Introduction > The name "Modularization of XHTML" now should be "XHTML Modularization" . Fixed. > >> A.6. Deleted > > I don't see any statements saying that the guidelines were originally > in the xhtml1 spec and brought in this document (and then revised). > Without such indication, having such empty section titled "deleted" > just doesn't make any sense. We need some backgroud information of the > guidelines and their changes. I added a paragraph about the move. > > For this section, having a rationale for the deletion would be better, perhaps? We are trying to avoid confusion by even mentioning what it used to say. I have added some text saying that it was deleted because it was obsolete. > >> A.7. The lang and xml:lang Attributes >> CSS has a "lang" pseudo selector that automatically uses the appropriate attribute depending on the media type. > > ":lang()" is a *pseudo-class* selector, not a *pseudo selector*. Fixed. > >> A.11. Document Object Model and XHTML > > The link referencing DOM1 does not appear in Appendix C. > I even wonder why it points to DOM1. There's a section called "XHTML > and the HTML DOM" [1] in DOM 2 HTML. I think that one is better suited > to cite. We don't actually use DOM level 2 in XHTML 1.x at this time. However, there is good text in there so I have referenced that as well. Done. > >> A.12. Using Ampersands > > Wouldn't it be better in addition to say that not escaping ampersands > would cause the document ill-formed? I added a note to that effect. > >> Appendix C. References > > I see a lot of references pointing nowhere (ascii, html40, http, mime, > rfc2119, etc.) so they need to be taken out. > And references should be updated (though I'm sure that I don't have to > say this :p ). Yeah - I am going through all of these now. Thanks for the reminder. > >> Appendix D. Changes from Previous Version > > If having a summary of changes since previous edition here, that would > be very nice. Updated. I will publish a new updated version shortly. Thanks again! -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 16 January 2009 15:01:30 UTC