W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > December 2009

Role Module to be discussed by PFWG today (was Re: No call today)

From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:38:46 +0000
To: "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, janina@rednote.net
Message-Id: <20091216142859.M50671@hicom.net>
aloha, steven!

great news in regards the PERs -- thanks for seeing them through to 
transition all who were responsible (i'm looking at you, shane and 
steven)

FYI: the protocols & formats group will be discussing whether or 
not to take up ownership of the XHTML2 Role Module at today's PF
call (1200h EST) with shane, markus and myself, all of whom have
offered to help the transition of the document from the XHTML2
WG to the PF WG and to continue its development/refinement; i 
sincerely hope that this is an initial conversation, and not a 
make-or-break meeting where it is decided "yea" or "nay" without
a chance for those of us who want to continue development of the 
Role Module (and the concepts it represents) to absorb PF's immediate
feedback, and to propose a roadmap/plan for adopting the Role Module,
or a genericized version thereof that can be used in HTML, XHTML, and
XML

hope y'all have a happy holiday break and a soulful solstice,
gregory.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
All decent people live beyond their incomes nowadays, and those who 
aren't respectable live beyond other people's.  A few gifted 
individuals manage to do both. - HH Munro, The Chronicles of Clovis
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net
      Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/
              Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus/
-------------------------------------------------------------------

---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
To: public-xhtml2@w3.org
Sent: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:03:49 +0100
Subject: No call today

> Since we reached the time-out period for Bjoern to reply, we can 
> now  proceed with the PERs.
> 
> However, I don't believe we have enough to talk about today to 
> need a call.
> 
> I propose the next call be on Wednesday 6 Jan at the usual time.
> 
> Have a great holiday, and speak to you in the new year!
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Steven
------- End of Original Message -------
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2009 14:40:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:54 GMT