W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Comments you sent

From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:59:51 +0100
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: "w3c-archive@w3.org" <w3c-archive@w3.org>, "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u41ah1spsmjzpq@steven-750g>
Hi Bjoern,

In the absence of a reply to my email, I am taking that as a negative, and  
we won't send you a reply directly. We will publish a response to the  
XHTML2 WG's email list as part of the coming transition of several of our  
specs, and so you may wish to watch for that.

Best wishes,

Steven Pemberton

On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:40:19 +0100, Steven Pemberton  
<steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:

> Hi there Bjoern,
>
> A while back you sent a mail to www-archive criticising some specs we  
> had submitted for PER.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009May/0029
>
> You spotted a couple of editorial errors, for which thanks, though it  
> would have been handier if you had told us about them directly; but you  
> also were wrong on a number of substantial points (such as claiming that  
> XHTML 1.1 and XHTML Modularization do not call out the prohibited  
> nesting rules).
>
> Anyway, my question is whether you were expecting, or would like  
> responses to your comments. The fact that you didn't send them to us  
> suggests you weren't, but I would be more than happy to send a reply if  
> you would like.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Steven Pemberton
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2009 14:00:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:54 GMT