W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > October 2008

Re: RDFa spec + XML Schema

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:31:31 -0500
Message-ID: <4905C2B3.1050509@aptest.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>

We don't need to issue it anytime soon - we just prepared it.  I think 
that we should do it before the SWD working group charter expires.  
Also, TimBL was sort of excited about there being a schema 
implementation of XHTML+RDFa.

Ivan Herman wrote:
> I am not sure issuing a PER a few weeks after having released the REC is
> really a good idea... it looks a bit funny to the outside world, it
> suggests that, well, we made a mistake. Is it so urgent?
>
> Ivan
>
> Steven Pemberton wrote:
>   
>> Hi TFers.
>>
>> Now that XHTML Modularization 1.1 is a rec, we have the opportunity to
>> reissue RDFa with an XML Schema attached.
>>
>> This would be as a PER, so the amount of process involved is minimal.
>>
>> We have an editor's draft already at
>>     http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20081018/
>>
>> We are reissuing XHTML 1.1, Basic and Print before the end of the year,
>> but we may wish to wait a little before redoing RDFa, since it is so
>> new, but it would be worth talking about at a call.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Steven
>>
>>     
>
>   

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 13:32:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:50 GMT