I agree, too. Have a nice day. Alessio --- Alessio Cartocci International Webmasters Association / The HTML Writers Guild http://www.iwanet.org 2008/10/7 Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>: > > Greetings, I agree with Shane that the comments all look reasonable and that > we should accept the proposed changes. We can then get back on track to move > to CR asap allowing the specs that depend on CURIE to start moving again. > > Regards, Roland > > > > From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> > To: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org> > Date: 07/10/2008 14:20 > Subject: [Fwd: W3C TAG Response to CURIE Last Call] > ________________________________ > > > > The TAG has sent is their comments. I have review them, and basically I > think we should just do what they ask. None of it is unreasonable. The > only place there is a disconnect is about the syntax for CURIE and the > corresponding XSD. They are correct that the XSD is wrong in our spec - > it does not permit all variations. Their suggestion was to change the > eBNF, but in fact the eBNF is fine. We just need to fix the XSD. > > Anyway, let's discuss tomorrow but I think it is fine.Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2008 13:02:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 October 2008 13:02:49 GMT