W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > November 2008

Re: [ACTION-33] Notes on XML Events 2 and event names

From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:56:33 +0000
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Cc: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, public-xhtml2-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFE1A7FF07.922BB7CA-ON8025750D.00364090-8025750D.0036ADAA@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings Shane, I think you have accurately summarised the discussion. I 
agree that the sentiment seemed to be that we make DOM 2 the baseline for 
our requirement and that we would expect that DOM 3 will be compatible 
with DOM 2 so that we define XE 2 such that it works on either and does 
not require new features of DOM 3.

Regards, Roland




From:
Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
To:
XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Date:
21/11/2008 18:53
Subject:
[ACTION-33] Notes on XML Events 2 and event names




(resent so it gets attached to ACTION)

During Wednesday's meeting, we discussed various approaches to dealing 
with event naming in XML Events 2.  I was asked to summarize this
conversation.  Here's what I think are the primary points and the
direction we were heading:

    * DOM 3 Events is still in development, and it is risky to make XML
      Events 2 dependent upon it.
    * DOM 2 Events has all of the structures that we need for XML Events
      2 - it just does not permit the use of QNames for event names.
    * It is possible to define XE2 such that the event name is a QName,
      and that the underlying implementation is tasked with magically
      mapping that into whatever the user agent supports.  There are
      lots of good reasons to do this, but it still leaves us with a
      dependency on DOM 3 Events.  There are also lots of good reasons
      to NOT do this.  The most compelling of these (thanks Mark!) is
      that our audience is document authors, and they are not going to
      create namespace-qualified event names anyway.  Spec authors are
      going to define qualified event names, and they need to deal with
      DOM 2 for the foreseeable future anyway.
    * The group seemed to be leaning toward changing the requirement
      back to DOM 2 Events, with a note that in the future we might
      extend this to encompass DOM 3 Events but that for now event names
      would remain unqualified.

Feel free to comment or correct this summary...  You can see the details
of the discussion at http://www.w3.org/2008/11/19-xhtml-minutes.html

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com











Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2008 09:57:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:50 GMT