Shane McCarron wrote: > > > Felix Sasaki wrote: >> at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-xml-i18n-bp-20080213/#integration-its-xhtmlmod >> . At least you ("you" meaning your working group) said it is >> conforming during your review of it. > I had forgotten you had put this together - thanks! Unfortunately you > do not appear to have created a DTD implementation of the module. I > will do that for you today. oh, thank you! > I note that you provide an example markup language that is xhtml basic > 1.0 + ITS. Is that what you want created in DTD form for the > validator? Or would you prefer XHTML 1.1 + ITS? I think the later > would be more interesting to a broader community than xhtml basic 1.0. this is really hard for me to judge. What do others think? FelixReceived on Thursday, 8 May 2008 12:38:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:48 GMT