W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > March 2008

Re: [css3-namespace] Last call comments from XHTML2 WG

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:22:55 +0100
Message-ID: <47ED1B5F.1000507@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org, Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>

Steven Pemberton wrote:

>     If I apply the forward-compatible parsing rules to a CSS(n+1) 
> stylesheet, stripping it of its CSS(n+1) features, I will get a CSS(n) 
> stylesheet. None of the rules left change their meaning in the process.
> 
> This has always been true in CSS, and the namespace selectors spec 
> changes this.

Depends what you define as a feature, honestly. CSS 1 did not allow
multiple class selectors...

</Daniel>
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 16:23:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:48 GMT