On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 08:36:30AM -0400, olivier Thereaux wrote: > >No, but only the XHTML 2 Working Group is developing XHTML specs, so > >I don't really think there is a risk of inconsistency here. > > Unfortunately, this is not how I understand the HTML WG charter: > http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#deliverables The HTML WG charter does, indeed, mention that they are to deliver "An extensible, serialized form of such a language, using XML" It does not to my knowledge say that this serialized form belong in the XHTML family of specifications. Perhaps someone could clear this up once and for all, and if needed clarify the charter. -- - Tina Holmboe Developer's Archive Greytower Technologies http://www.dev-archive.net http://www.greytower.netReceived on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 12:46:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 March 2008 12:46:44 GMT