W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > April 2008

Re: [XHTML] XML Events 2 : script element, @implements

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:57:28 +0200
To: "Roland Merrick" <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t92d921hsmjzpq@acer3010>

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:38:22 +0200, Roland Merrick  
<roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> The script element will support an additional attribute: "implements"
>
> implements attribute is defined as follows:
> the implements attributes specifies that the script identified by the  
> @src
> provides an implementation of the specified namespace. The script should
> only be loaded and used if the user agent does not have an implementation
> of the specified namespace.
>
> example:
>   <script src="xmlEvents2.js" type="...." implements="
> http://www.w3.org/2001/xml-events" />
>
> Question 1: is this what the participants thought was agreed?

Yes, except that it isn't just @src, but also the contents of the script  
element.

> Question 2: if it was, then is a namespace not too coarse a unit? Should
> we identify features within a namespace, perhaps a feature might be
> equivalent to an XHTML module.

We didn't discuss more than the namespace. I'd personally be happy with  
the namespace (I think), but I'd be happy to discuss it.

> Question 3: how, if it all, does this relate to the DOM hasFeature  
> method?

Also needs discussion. I have no answers at present.

Steven

> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/02/19-xhtml-minutes.html#item03
>
> Regards, Roland
> FBCS, CITP
>
>
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6  
> 3AU
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 12:58:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:48 GMT