Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev

Shane McCarron wrote:
> 
> I guess I was proposing "transformation" in the XHTML vocab# space is
> because the already use it and they are a REC.  I don't think we should
> second guess their choice, but with our current language for XHTML 2 and
> XHTML+RDFa their value would be invalid.  And that seems
> counter-productive.

Except they use it *only* when there's a GRDDL @profile, and I'm pretty
sure DanC would say that it shouldn't mean anything without a @profile
(follow-your-nose.)

Also, why is this in scope?

-Ben