W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Re: two mailing lists - is one too many

From: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:19:18 +0100
To: "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Cc: "Melvin Carvalho" <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, "WebID XG" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, public-webid@w3.org, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v8o8ygkysvvqwp@sith.local>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:52:33 +0100, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>  
wrote:

>
> On 26 Jan 2012, at 16:31, Coralie Mercier wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:11:29 +0100, Henry Story  
>> <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that really depends on the procedures that you at the W3C are
>>> allowed to do. So here is what we need to base our decision on:
>>> - is it possible for the W3C to move everyone from xg list to  
>>> public-webid
>>>  list without asking each of the people there to do this manually?
>>> Henry
>>
>> Hi Henry
>>
>> Please, clarify. There are currently 76 people subscribed to  
>> public-xg-webid. These people where those who subscribed themselves  
>> manually. The participants of the former XG were subscribed  
>> automatically and are no longer subscribed.
>
> I have trouble understanding that.
> "The participants of the former XG were subscribed automatically and are  
> no longer subscribed."

Sorry!

> I suppose you mean the members of the XG were unsubscribed from the  
> mailing list automatically and are no longer subscribed to the XG  
> mailing list.

Yes, this is what I meant.

> (I had understood that subscribing to the webid  community group  
> automatically  resubscribed members to the public-xg list)
>
>>
>> Does your question concern the 76 people or the state of the list  
>> before we closed the group?
>
> Well my question is: can the subscribers to the XG mailing list be moved  
> to the other mailing list, without asking every one of them to move, and  
> to resubscribe. I suppose the answer is yes, because
> I was told the move from one group to the other would be fluid and  
> seamless. But I just thought I
> would ask.

Yes, it is feasible.

Coralie

> 	Henry
>
>>
>> Coralie
>>
>> --
>>  Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Communications Team  -  http://www.w3.org
>>     W3C/ERCIM - B219 - 2004, rte des lucioles - 06410 Biot - FR
>> mailto:coralie@w3.org +33492387590 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>


-- 
   Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Communications Team  -  http://www.w3.org
      W3C/ERCIM - B219 - 2004, rte des lucioles - 06410 Biot - FR
mailto:coralie@w3.org +33492387590 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 16:19:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 January 2012 16:19:34 GMT