- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:46:33 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>
- Cc: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, public-webid@w3.org, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
On 23 January 2012 21:01, Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote: > We have two public mailing lists for the WebID Community Group. > The XG mailing list has all those who subscribed to the XG mailing > list + all the members of the WebID Community Group, while the > public-webid mailing list only has the WebID members and those who > joined and subscribed to that. The number of members are > > > - 90 e-mail accounts for public-xg-webid@w3.org > - 26 for public-webid@w3.org > > I think it would be good to close one of them as otherwise discussions > will end up be going in parallel in both groups, and so water down the > conversation. > > So the ideal may be to move everyone on public-xg-webid to public-webid. > But if that cannot be done without asking everybody to resubscribe, > then I think it may be better to close the public-webid mailing list, > and stick with the weird XG legacy. Perhaps the CG mailing list should focus on the nitty gritty of the spec. And more general discussions inc. WebID return foaf-protocols, and apps in the readwrite web group. The reason I suggest this is that there have been some comments about the volume of mails on this list being a chalenge follow, so splitting things up could allow a degree of focus. > > > Henry > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ >
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 11:58:09 UTC