W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Re: what are claims mirrors?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:29:33 -0500
Message-ID: <4F14344D.4000603@openlinksw.com>
To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 1/16/12 9:26 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>
> At the current time, based on experiments with Jurgen, do at least 
> mandate hash URIs or incorporate the 303 redirection rules for slash. 
> Failing to do this simply introduces unexpected burned and ambiguity. 
> Neither works for WebID adoption. 
To be consistent I should have said:


At the current time, based on experiments with Jurgen, do at least 
mandate hash *URLs* or incorporate the 303 redirection rules for slash. 
Failing to do this simply introduces unexpected burned and ambiguity. 
Neither works for WebID adoption.

Loose use of URI just confuses people.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








Received on Monday, 16 January 2012 14:29:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 January 2012 14:29:56 GMT