W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Re: fixed https://foafssl.org/test/WebId

From: Andreas Radinger <andreas.radinger@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:21:42 +0100
Message-ID: <4F06D946.3090005@ebusiness-unibw.org>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
CC: Jürgen Jakobitsch <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>, "public-xg-webid@w3.org XG" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 1/6/12 1:53 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2012, at 01:46, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
>
>> hi again,
>>
>> the file is simply ok and available.
>>
>> when using telnet you might want to stick to the examples from this page [1]
>>
>> i'm not a telnet pro, but i get at least my index page without hash, i'm pretty
>> sure telnet is able to work with hash uris.
> Telnet knows nothing of HTTP. It's just a simple tcp connection. You can use that if you want
> to see exactly what is going on the wire.
>
> Anyway, I am told that sending a URI with a # is a mistake, and that servers are in their right
> to send a 404. I suppose I was expecting the apache library to do the right thing by itself.
>
Hi Henry,

you are right,
the mistake is the client application which sends a URI with a hash
fragment in the HTTP request to a server.
=> the file is ok
=> the tomcat server is ok to send a 404
=> telnet is a good example of a bad client application

Best,
Andreas
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 11:25:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 January 2012 11:25:09 GMT