W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Re: WebIDRealm RDFa

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 01:37:29 +0100
Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org
Message-Id: <8EAFF62D-8649-4F0A-9C31-C9ADC31F6F85@bblfish.net>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>

On 5 Jan 2012, at 01:27, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

> On 1/4/12 7:16 PM, Henry Story wrote:
>> On 5 Jan 2012, at 01:09, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> 
>>>> But anyway, clearly you don't want to work on a common test suite to help new people join.
>>> See my opening comments. It's been done before, many times over with standards much more complex than WebID, used by masses of people world wide.
>> Ok. So are you against a webid test suite then? Yes/No
> FWIW - No.

Why? What would be the problem with having an OpenSource set of tests to help newcomers who produce new WebID Protocol endpoints to run a bunch of tests against it to find out if they are WebID compliant? 

Did we not in this thread use a whole bunch of tests suites/validators? For RDFa, for RDF/XML etc....

Were they not helpful?

It would help if you explained your position more clearly because it could be that we have a misunderstanding between what you think I am talking about and what I think I am talking about.

Henry


> 
> 
> Kingsley
>> If yes, how do you think we should proceed.
>> If no, why do you think we should not have one?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>>  Perhaps WebID would be just too simple then....
>>> No comment :-)
>> Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 01:36:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 January 2012 01:36:24 GMT