W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Re: WebID equivalence

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:03:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKcwGaAU+SRUMhyALyrLxh7vyhswNWU3V3=eoKs+Dkjhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 4 January 2012 17:46, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
> On 1/4/12 10:58 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>
>> Linked Data is about using networks (graph structures and hypertext
>> structures, cleverly combined) to describe things. In some
>> circumstances, one or the other aspect takes primacy; and in some
>> circumstances, one or the other side can be a bit of a burden. That's
>> fine so long as we don't insist too heavily that all good data must
>> fit some rigid template of being hypertext-published interconnected
>> graphs.
>
>
> WebID is insisting heavily without accepting burden related realities for:
>
> 1. developers of WebID verifiers
> 2. publishers of identity oriented claims.
>
> This is what I fear will lead to bootstrap inertia, inevitably.
>
> The goal in its most basic form boils down to testing for "mirrored claims"
> about identity across an idp space (on a network) and a local key store.
> This goal is achievable without surfacing some of the more burdensome
> aspects of Linked Data. IMHO. graph portability is the most important factor
> of all. The claims graph should be loosely coupled to the network.

I'm a huge fan of loose coupling.

Right now we have 2 concepts : WebID and The WebID Protocol

WebID
=======

An IDENTIFIER Coupled to:
URIs -- Yes
HTTP -- encouraged


The WebID Protocol 1.0 (Draft)
===========================

An AUTHENTICATION method coupled to:
WebID -- Yes
X.509 -- Yes
HTTP -- Yes
TLS -- Yes
RDF -- Yes


So at this point, we have a general concept and a specific protocol.
Can sometimes be confusing, due to the naming, even for people in the
community!

There's generally a trade-off between tolerance, adoption and
implementation complexity.   I think Kinsley is saying there's a good
opportunity here, to finding a "sweet spot" without too much resorting
to trial and error.

>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> Founder&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2012 18:03:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 4 January 2012 18:03:50 GMT