Re: comments to references

On 28 Oct 2011, at 11:37, Henry Story wrote:

> 
> On 28 Oct 2011, at 12:04, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote:
> 
>> On 28.10.2011 11:51, Henry Story wrote:
>>> I agree that sadly there are not many complete N3 parsers, so we should use turtle.
>> May I add the action: remove N3 references in spec?
> 
> yes from me.
> 
>> 
>>> Now you want one more, that is not standard.
>> It will be standard. It is going to be one of four official serializactions of RDF model (near RDFa, RDF/XML and Turtle[and N-Triples]). Additionally, it just optional serialization.
>> But I'm not stubborn on this issue ;)
> 
> I think we should wait till they are standard or until we can prove a large number of people support it.
> So earl implementations will help for that.

Excuse me if I have caught the arse end of the conversation, but am sure that nearly all of he RDF libs/triplestores support turtle. 

sesame, jena, virtuoso, 4store, redland, arc2, redstore, and so on must all support turtle.

Mischa

> 
>> 
>>>> 3. I suggest to change Turtle references to more actual [2]
>>> 
>>> that's a good idea
>> May I add the action: change Turtle reference in spec?
> 
> yes from me.
> 
> But we should have a few other people chime in.
> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
> 
> 

___________________________________
Mischa Tuffield PhD
Email: mischa.tuffield@garlik.com
Homepage - http://mmt.me.uk/
+44(0)208 439 8200  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD