Final -- cert:key accepted

Ok,

   It looks like we have enough implementers and other who like cert:key . I'll replace the cert:public_key with it.
When we have a few implementations we can then remove the "unstable" flags.

   Does someone want to take on the task of rewriting the examples in the spec to use cert:key instead of cert:identity ?

Henry

 
On 14 Oct 2011, at 14:52, Sergio Fernández wrote:

> +1 for me as well to cert:key
> El 13/10/2011 21:05, "Andrei Sambra" <andrei@fcns.eu> escribió:
> +1 for me as well. Good, elegant solution.
> 
> I can't comment on it too much, but I'm trying to follow this topic.
> 
> Andrei
> 
> Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote:
> On 13.10.2011 14:41, Henry Story wrote:
> > cert key has my +1 too.
> +1 for key:cert
> 
> 
> Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/