W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > November 2011

RE: struggling with ASK

From: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:35:12 -0800
Message-ID: <SNT143-W632423C213CD163C4A837892B30@phx.gbl>
To: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
CC: "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>

I added the xsd (before this email) to the ASK, and it made no difference.

 

I have added a sparql protocol client to the code, used when local sparql fails. Who has a public sparql protocol endpoint that is able to remotely process the ask for me, given addition of a FROM clause?

 

Using someone else ASK processor will help eliminate the issue's source. (It may be my choice of ever-aging sparql library and non-conformance, for all I know).

 

Eliminate the contributor line, acting as editor. If the last 3 years (until just now) didnt count as a contribution, neither does publishing 50 lines of web script (and using windows as is, to mint certs). In general, Im just not interested in social networking culture, with its adolescent games about who is friends with who, who names drops, who links to who, whose pingbacks are censored, who is an author, who is a "instrumental." These kinds of behaviours have nothing to do with the world of business I work in and have are an anathama to the culture which taught me professional key management - where folks lives are on the line. At the same time, I've no objection to this stuff faciliating protest-grade key management - as such scaling engineering cases adds interesting stresses (which benefits mainstream engineering, by hightending the robustness level achieved in commodity software). it all adds to civil society, in reasonable measure.

 

Obviously, stripped of the irrrelevant (peter's contribution status) these last points speak to the final report. Just WHO is the audience? Who does webid speak to?

 





29 Nov 2011 19:45:54 +0100
> CC: public-xg-webid@w3.org
> To: home_pw@msn.com
> Subject: Re: struggling with ASK
>
>
> On 29 Nov 2011, at 19:22, Henry Story wrote:
>
> >
> > On 29 Nov 2011, at 18:41, Peter Williams wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> PREFIX : <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#>
> >> ASK {
> >> <https://bob.example/webid#public> :key [
> >> :modulus "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"^^xsd:hexBinary;
> >> :exponent 65537;
> >> ] .
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Where did you see the missing xsd issue? It would be lovely for these to be the two gotchas.
> >
> > Up there in the SPARQL . It should be
> >
> > PREFIX : <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#>
> > PREFIX xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>
> > ASK {
> > ?webid :key [
> > :modulus ?mod;
> > :exponent ?exp;
> > ] .
> > }
> >
> > I fixed that and a number of other issues in the mercurial repository. We should probably do a quick update of what is on the
> > web site.
>
> Ok, that section is fixed now. There were a few other changes that had been accumulating.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/#verifying-the-webid-claim
>
> I also added you as contributor at the end.
>
>
> Henry
>
> >
> > Henry
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >
> > Social Web Architect
> > http://bblfish.net/
> >
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
> 		 	   		  
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 19:35:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 November 2011 19:35:52 GMT