- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:27:58 -0500
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4ED3FCDE.60706@openlinksw.com>
On 11/28/11 4:12 PM, Mo McRoberts wrote: > So, I’m going to ask this and hope that I’m not going regret it: what things which*aren’t* RDF and aren't trivially deserialised to RDF graphs which you believe WebID applications should support consuming or generating which:— > > a) people actually use; and > > b) aren’t horrifically ambiguous when used as part of any larger system; and, for bonus points, > > c) don’t require massive amounts of prior knowledge in any passive consumer? HTML with Microdata based structured data islands. An option to sit alongside: XHTML+RDFa and RDF/XML . > > Are there any, or is this all just contentious objection on the basis of a perceived hypothetical problem? > > M. > > -- Mo McRoberts - Technical Lead - The Space, 0141 422 6036 (Internal: > 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E, Project Office: Room 7083, BBC > Television Centre, London W12 7RJ -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 28 November 2011 21:28:22 UTC